Course shopping
Sep. 19th, 2006 07:38 pmLowell House on the Feast of St. Joseph and Companions
More blather about shopping period. Modern European Intellectual History is horribly intimidating, with huge amounts of reading (I just got the sourcebook, and it's nearly 700 pages long). The professor was probably my archetype of the Harvard humanities professor: extremely articulate, a little neurotic, and very passionate about his subject. My only qualm about the course is the amount of work involved; the professor says the main challenge is the reading since there would "only" be three "short" papers and a "straightforward" final examination. I'm not sure if I trust his concept of "short" and "straightforward", but after talking it over with my mother, I decided to take it anyway.
The reading list for this course includes most of the major thinkers of the modern era: Nietzsche, Freud, Lukacs, Adorno, Horkheimer, Heidegger, Weber, Sartre, de Beauvoir, Camus, Lévi-Strauss, Derrida and Foucault. I figure I'd be able to say that I've had a proper liberal arts education after such a runthrough. But seriously, I really like the way the professor thinks, the questions he poses, and the way he contextualizes these ideas. If it were a pure philosophy class, I'd probably not find it as interesting, but the historical lens makes it fascinating. It's still intimidating though because I've never been surrounded by so many humanities concentrators in one class. I'll have to muster up the nerve not to drown in discussion sections.
Intertextuality failed to blow me away; the professor was nice but didn't thrill me, if that makes any sense. A shame because the course had an interesting reading list too (Byatt's Possession, Murakami's Kafka on the Shore among others), and I thought, looking through the syllabus, that it would be really neat to do a final paper on fanfiction (if that was allowed). The topics being covered are exactly the same questions arising in fandom meta. Nonetheless, the lecture was, well, not really scintillating. The only exciting part was interpreting the sparrow in Catullus' poem "Lesbia's Sparrow" as a phallic symbol, haha. It's a much easier course though (only two hours a week, no section, two papers), and I wondered whether I shouldn't go the route of keeping my sanity intact instead. But oh well, what is college for if not to take risks?
Structural Biology was boring. So much for my efforts to understand crystallography. I really shouldn't call myself a "biochemistry" concentrator; I'm really a molecular biologist/geneticist through and through. -_-
Anyway, so I'll be taking Classical Chinese Ethical and Political Thought, Modern European Intellectual History, and Developmental Biology. Plus thesis research, of course. Let's hope I'm not making a huge mistake.
Kendo practice tonight. By the way, the MAC is closed next spring. (
ladydaera,
klio911, did you hear about it yet?) It's just wonderful that the administration doesn't tell us ahead of time but waits for us to find out through the Crimson. Of course no mention of how club sports are utterly screwed over by this decision.
Yours &c.
More blather about shopping period. Modern European Intellectual History is horribly intimidating, with huge amounts of reading (I just got the sourcebook, and it's nearly 700 pages long). The professor was probably my archetype of the Harvard humanities professor: extremely articulate, a little neurotic, and very passionate about his subject. My only qualm about the course is the amount of work involved; the professor says the main challenge is the reading since there would "only" be three "short" papers and a "straightforward" final examination. I'm not sure if I trust his concept of "short" and "straightforward", but after talking it over with my mother, I decided to take it anyway.
The reading list for this course includes most of the major thinkers of the modern era: Nietzsche, Freud, Lukacs, Adorno, Horkheimer, Heidegger, Weber, Sartre, de Beauvoir, Camus, Lévi-Strauss, Derrida and Foucault. I figure I'd be able to say that I've had a proper liberal arts education after such a runthrough. But seriously, I really like the way the professor thinks, the questions he poses, and the way he contextualizes these ideas. If it were a pure philosophy class, I'd probably not find it as interesting, but the historical lens makes it fascinating. It's still intimidating though because I've never been surrounded by so many humanities concentrators in one class. I'll have to muster up the nerve not to drown in discussion sections.
Intertextuality failed to blow me away; the professor was nice but didn't thrill me, if that makes any sense. A shame because the course had an interesting reading list too (Byatt's Possession, Murakami's Kafka on the Shore among others), and I thought, looking through the syllabus, that it would be really neat to do a final paper on fanfiction (if that was allowed). The topics being covered are exactly the same questions arising in fandom meta. Nonetheless, the lecture was, well, not really scintillating. The only exciting part was interpreting the sparrow in Catullus' poem "Lesbia's Sparrow" as a phallic symbol, haha. It's a much easier course though (only two hours a week, no section, two papers), and I wondered whether I shouldn't go the route of keeping my sanity intact instead. But oh well, what is college for if not to take risks?
Structural Biology was boring. So much for my efforts to understand crystallography. I really shouldn't call myself a "biochemistry" concentrator; I'm really a molecular biologist/geneticist through and through. -_-
Anyway, so I'll be taking Classical Chinese Ethical and Political Thought, Modern European Intellectual History, and Developmental Biology. Plus thesis research, of course. Let's hope I'm not making a huge mistake.
Kendo practice tonight. By the way, the MAC is closed next spring. (
Yours &c.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-19 11:56 pm (UTC)And, what, no Durkheim or Bourdieu? Hmph. XD (And as regards the Chinese Ethical and Political Thought course, yes, I'm not surprised that there should be sweeping statements and the like. And I'm rather curious about how it shall play out.)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-20 03:04 am (UTC)I'll probably post incessantly about the Moral Reasoning course
wailing for helpso I'm sure you'll hear about it. XD;;(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-20 12:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-20 03:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-20 01:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-20 03:09 am (UTC)The Chinese philosophy course is really excellent: covers Confucius, Mo Tzu, Mencius, Lao Tzu, Chuang Tzu, Hsun Tzu, Han Fei Tzu, Sima Qian, and a lot of Han philosophers/commentators. As my father says, all the major texts one ought to read for the civil service exam. XD
(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-21 12:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-20 01:01 am (UTC)Hahaha, I totally forgot you had kendo and was wondering where you were. My brain is fried XD
I really shouldn't call myself a "biochemistry" concentrator; I'm really a molecular biologist/geneticist through and through. -_-
ME TOO
(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-20 03:27 am (UTC)Don't worry, this is not a usual practice time so it's all right if you were confused. Mother was confused as well and kept calling me in the middle of practice. -_-
(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-20 01:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-20 03:16 am (UTC)